AZBERS Innovations
Home/Products
Platform portfolio

Compliance and security platforms built for evidence.

Nothing here started as a product idea. Each one began as a gap we kept running into on real engagements, and stayed because it kept being useful afterwards. Two of them now carry most of our attention.

Flagship Coming soon

CyberNexus

Compliance verification and remediation held end to end, so a control that is marked closed is closed against evidence somebody reviewed and accepted.

Built for the two sides of the same problem. An oversight body needs to see across many organisations without drowning in attachments. Each organisation needs to see its own queue of work with owners and dates attached. CyberNexus serves both from the same record.

Explore CyberNexus
Flagship Coming soon

ControlGraph

One control, held once, answering every framework that asks for it, inside a structure that also knows what each control is protecting and who owns it.

The same connections that let evidence travel between frameworks also make consequence visible. When a system is found weak, the graph already knows which controls depended on it, which obligations those controls satisfied, and who needs to hear about it.

Explore ControlGraph
Also in the portfolio

Focused tools that solve one problem well.

These came out of specific engagements. They are narrower than the flagship platforms by design, and they are still maintained.

ComplianceVault

Qatar NIAP work from business impact analysis through data classification, control assessment and the evidence trail that makes the audit go quietly.

View platform

Threat Intelligence Mapper

Raw reporting in, mapped techniques and sector relevance out, with a short answer on whether anything needs to change for the reader.

View platform

PaperTrail

Open source Windows print auditing. Small, readable, and free for anyone who needs visibility over what leaves the building on paper.

View utility
Where to start

Find the one that matches your situation.

Most people recognise their own problem in one line of this list straight away, which is usually the faster route than comparing feature tables.

01

You oversee many organisations and cannot see across them

Submissions arrive in twenty different shapes and comparing them takes a quarter. CyberNexus holds the verification and remediation lifecycle so oversight is a view rather than a reassembly job.

 02

You answer to several frameworks and keep repeating yourself

The same control described four times, in four documents, three of which are now out of date. ControlGraph holds it once and lets it count everywhere it is asked.

 03

You are working through a Qatar NIAP programme

One framework, known properly rather than loosely, carried from the first impact analysis to the pack you hand over on audit day.

 04

More threat reporting arrives than anyone can read

The bottleneck was never collection. Threat Intelligence Mapper does the translation step, and ends at the one check worth running this week.

 05

You have no idea what leaves the building on paper

Almost nothing watches that channel, and investigations notice the gap late. PaperTrail is small, open source and free.
Questions we get asked

Before you get in touch

The questions that come up most often, answered the way we would answer them on a call.

Which of these is actually available today?

PaperTrail is open source and available now. CyberNexus and ControlGraph are in active development and open for design partner conversations. ComplianceVault and Threat Intelligence Mapper came out of live engagements and are used in delivery work.

Do we have to choose one?

No, and most organisations do not. They solve different parts of the same problem, and the connections between them are deliberate. Start where the pain is and the rest can follow.

Can they run inside our own environment?

Private cloud, on premises and air gapped paths can be supported. For the kind of organisation these are built for, that tends to be a condition rather than a preference.

Where does AI fit in all of this?

In the reading, and nowhere near the deciding. It reads long documents, proposes mappings and flags what looks thin. Every acceptance stays with a named person and a date.

Interested in an early conversation?

Both flagship platforms are open for design partner discussions with organisations that carry real compliance weight. If that sounds like you, we would rather hear about your problem than show you a deck.

Start the conversation